Elon Musk is no stranger to controversy, innovation, and public scrutiny — but this time, the headlines aren’t about rockets, Teslas, or Twitter/X. Instead, the world is buzzing about something far more personal: a diary belonging to one of his sons, and the shocking revelations hidden within its pages.
According to reports, Musk stumbled upon the diary during a quiet moment at home. What began as simple curiosity quickly turned into a life-altering discovery, with entries that left him stunned, emotional, and questioning the very foundation of his relationship with his child.
The Unexpected Discovery
Sources say Musk didn’t intend to pry, but when the diary accidentally came into his hands, he decided to read a few lines. Those lines turned into hours of reading, uncovering deep feelings of isolation, struggles with identity, and raw confessions about what it’s like to grow up in the shadow of the world’s richest man.
One entry reportedly read: “Everyone thinks having Elon Musk as a dad is like living in a dream. But sometimes, it feels like I’m competing with rockets and inventions for his attention.”
For a man known for chasing Mars and reshaping industries, these words cut deeper than any financial loss.
A Glimpse Into Hidden Pain
The diary didn’t just reveal loneliness — it also highlighted the pressure of fame. Musk’s son allegedly wrote about being followed at school, treated differently by friends, and never knowing whether people liked him for who he was or for his father’s fortune and fame.
Perhaps the most devastating revelation was a note that simply said: “I just want to be seen, not as Musk’s son, but as me.”
The Turning Point for Elon Musk
Those closest to Musk say the diary has changed him profoundly. While Elon is often painted as a visionary obsessed with the future of humanity, this intimate glimpse into his son’s heart has forced him to reconsider his priorities.
Rumors suggest Musk has already made quiet but significant changes: spending more one-on-one time with his children, cutting down on late-night work marathons, and even rethinking how much of his private life should be in the public eye.
Fans and Critics React
The story has sparked heated debates online. Supporters have praised Musk for reportedly taking the revelations to heart, calling it a powerful reminder that even billionaires are just parents at the end of the day. Critics, however, accuse him of violating his son’s privacy by reading the diary in the first place, saying the act itself reflects a lack of boundaries.
Twitter/X exploded with comments like:
“Elon needed this wake-up call. Family before Mars.”
“This is heartbreaking — the cost of fame no one talks about.”
“Invading your kid’s privacy is not the way to build trust.”
Bigger Than Musk
Beyond the drama, the story resonates because it highlights a universal truth: children of powerful figures often bear invisible burdens. Wealth, fame, and influence may create opportunities, but they also create walls of expectation, pressure, and scrutiny.
For Elon Musk, this diary may be the most important project he’s ever opened — not because it changes the world, but because it changes his world.
Hate Watching Little Evil: Little Evil, Big Opinions
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:00:00 -0800 ◦ 96 minutes
What happens when a sharp horror-comedy premise gets tripped up by soggy jokes and TV-flat reactions? We dig into Little Evil with a filmmaker’s eye and a comic’s ear, mapping the moments that could have soared if the setups, POV, and character logic actually aligned. From the tornado wedding and the defensive videographer to the CPS visit with Sally Field and the clown-on-fire gag, we point to where the movie almost clicks—and how a few simple escalations could have turned “heh” into real laughs.
We talk casting and cadence—why Adam Scott feels stuck between unaffected snark and sincere guardian, and why Evangeline Lilly’s character needs true naivete or sharper subversion to sell the cult backstory. We break down the stepdad circle, the missing runners, and the squandered improv energy, highlighting the rare lines that do land because they come from a clear scene location and status game. Then we tackle the water park turn: why comedy needs agency over skywriting, how competing “signs” would heighten indecision into a great gag, and why the story works best once the promise to protect the kid becomes the emotional north star.
The finale shows the movie that could have been: a tighter cult showdown, a sincere bond, and a couple of truly funny beats when everyone finally knows where they are in the scene. Along the way, we offer craft fixes—repetition, heightening, physical business that breathes, and jokes that emerge from character instead of references. We wrap with quick recs: the baffling IT prequel pilot, dirt-under-the-nails seventies thriller When a Stranger Calls, and the confidently directed Weapons. Hit play, debate with us, and tell us your rewrite for the water park scene. If you had one change to make Little Evil sing, what would it be? Subscribe, drop a comment, and share your best punch-up.
Written Lovingly by AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Werewolves: Don’t Forget Your Moonscreen
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 15:00:00 -0400 ◦ 80 minutes
A supermoon turns the world wild, Frank Grillo grabs a shotgun, and we grab our notes. We break down Werewolves with the kind of scene-by-scene nitpicks and love for schlock that only come from watching too many creature features at 2 a.m. The premise is killer—moonlight triggers global transformations—but the movie keeps stepping on its own paws with lens-flare-heavy cinematography, shaky rules, and a finale that forgets what it promised. So we do what we do best: call out the misses, celebrate the moments that rip, and map the small rewrites that would turn this into a cult favorite.
We start with the visuals: anamorphic flares, exploding bulbs, and Steadicam sweeps that look expensive but rarely build dread. From there, we tackle the lore. What actually kills these wolves? How long does “moonscreen” last? Why does a pack stage a clever trap in one scene, then forget to smell a human under a car the next? Clean rules make scary movies scarier. We even offer a fix for the ending: plant one hesitation beat earlier—have a turned husband falter at his wife’s voice—so the final showdown feels earned instead of random.
It’s not all gripes. We shout out the birdbath eye-rinse gag, the alley car-charge, and a soft-focus kitchen reveal that delivers honest chills. We also dig into transformations and why practical effects matter in werewolf cinema, offer a better ammo plan for the beleaguered mom, and unpack how a “dominate the pack” idea could have reshaped the third act. If you love creature features, script logic, or just want to laugh at a billion-wolf apocalypse set in a Florida that isn’t, you’re home.
Hit play, then tell us your favorite werewolf movie and the one rule it nails. If you’re new, subscribe for weekly horror rants, rewrites, and the occasional Superman heresy. If you’re a regular, drop a review—it helps other monster nerds find us.
Written Lovingly by AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Superman: An Unpopular Opinion
Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:00:00 -0700 ◦ 100 minutes
A Superman movie where the dog makes more choices than the Man of Steel? We dove into James Gunn’s take and found a shiny spectacle that keeps dodging the heart of the character. From a midstream opening to a city-leviathan set piece shot through a fish-eye lens, the film races past the moments that would make us care, then tries to land on a heartfelt message about humanity it doesn’t quite earn.
We dig into why the quiet scenes sing—the Pa Kent farm talk and the final reflection—and how they whisper the contours of a better film: one where Superman wrestles with power, responsibility, and the courage to inspire rather than overpower. We also spotlight the true scene-stealer: Mr. Terrific. His competence, dry humor, and clear methods hint at the grounded, team-driven storytelling this world could support. Meanwhile, the Daily Planet ensemble, public-opinion whiplash, and a pocket-universe prison full of glass boxes illustrate how setup after setup goes un-paid-off, sapping stakes and coherence.
This episode unpacks the plot mechanics, the character arcs that aren’t, and the choice architecture that should define Superman but rarely shows up here. We question the Justice team’s late pivot, the citywide consequences that never land, and the way recurring gags step on tension. And yes, we talk Crypto: when a superdog becomes the clutch play, the movie’s center has drifted. If you love Superman’s ethos—hope, restraint, and moral clarity under pressure—this breakdown will give you language to explain what’s missing and how it could be fixed.
Enjoy the breakdown? Follow, rate, and share the show so more listeners can find it. Drop your rewrite for the third act in the comments—how would you make Superman’s humanity the thing that wins?
Written Lovingly by AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Freddy Vs. Jason: Dumb Fun Done Right
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:00:00 -0700 ◦ 77 minutes
Two horror titans enter, consistency takes a vacation, and we can’t stop talking about why it still works. We rewind to 2003 and pull apart Freddy vs. Jason from its crisp, newcomer‑friendly recap to the outsized, fire‑lit brawls that the whole campaign was built around. We’re honest about the warts: clunky teen dialogue, jump scares with no crescendo, and lore that forgets its own rules. We’re also here for the highs: Robert Englund having a blast as a razor‑fingered showman, a hulking Jason cutting a path through a cornfield, and a handful of striking images that remind you how potent these icons can be when the camera actually looks.
We map the story’s logic (such as it is): Freddy stokes fear by resurrecting Jason, the town buries the past with a hush regime, and our kids try to outthink both monsters with Hypnosil and a road trip to Crystal Lake. Along the way we debate whether crowd kills help or hurt the mood, why mask fit and silhouette matter for menace, and how the movie tosses aside the classic “fight sleep” tension that made Nightmare sing. The dream‑realm pinball fight versus the dockside industrial smackdown gives us two flavors of violence, and that rebar shot, the lake reveal, and the final misdirect all stick the landing with a grin.
Is it scary? Not really. Is it dumb fun? Absolutely—and sometimes that’s enough. If you want meticulous rules and slow‑burn dread, go back to the early entries. If you want heavyweight horror branding colliding like action figures in a bonfire, this crossover still swings. Hit play to hear our favorite shots, least favorite logic gaps, and the moments that prove spectacle can carry a movie further than sense ever could.
Enjoyed the breakdown? Follow, rate, and share the show with a friend who has strong feelings about Team Freddy or Team Jason. Tell us your winner and your favorite kill shot in the comments!
Written lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Broken Arrow: John Woo’s Woes
Wed, 08 Oct 2025 12:00:00 -0700 ◦ 90 minutes
Nuclear theft, a smirking supervillain, and a train sequence that refuses to quit—our rewatch of John Woo’s Broken Arrow is a love letter to the wildest corners of ’90s action. We kick off Todd’s birthday stream with a question we can’t stop asking: why do some “bad” movies age into perfect Friday-night fun? From the opening boxing match that telegraphs John Travolta’s heel turn to the copper mine countdown and that infamous dummy shot, we break down what’s silly, what’s sharp, and what still absolutely rocks.
We talk craft first—Woo’s kinetic framing, musical stings that brand the villain, and the set-piece logic that prioritizes momentum over realism. Travolta’s Deakins is a performance to savor: cigarette choreo, off-kilter affectations, and one-liners delivered like souvenirs. Christian Slater’s Riley Hale adds human scale—witty, bruised, and just competent enough to keep the chase honest. We dig into how Graham Yost (Speed) trades tight architecture for sprawling fun, why the $20 running gag works as a narrative thread, and how the movie sneaks in actual smart bits—like using an EMP to flip a helicopter from hunter to wreckage.
Along the way, we spotlight Samantha Mathis’s Ranger Terry, Delroy Lindo’s steady presence, and the movie’s unapologetic ’90s DNA: practical explosions, miniature mayhem, and VHS-ready quips. Yes, the physics are friendly, the Pentagon is plot-convenient, and helicopters can’t aim—but the joy is real. And that train finale? Still a banger. We finish with what we’re watching now (Marvel Zombies and Chad Powers) and tease next week’s spooky-season pick: Freddy vs. Jason.
If you’re nostalgic for maximalist action or just crave a good-bad gem that plays great with friends, queue this one up, then hit play on our breakdown. Subscribe, share with a fellow Woo fan, and drop your favorite Travolta line in the comments. Ain’t it cool?
Written Lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Nothing But Trouble: The Penis Nose Episode
Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:00:00 -0400 ◦ 77 minutes
Ever watch a movie that feels like it was built out of wild props and late-night dreams—and then realize no one bothered to build the world around it? We dive headfirst into Nothing but Trouble, tracing how a killer cast (Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase, Demi Moore, John Candy) and a bonkers premise wobble into an unappealing blur of gadgets, traps, and gross-out gags. From the courtroom rollercoaster and the infamous Bone Stripper to a Hawaiian Punch dinner and a cameo from Digital Underground, we break down why spectacle without stakes falls flat—and where the film accidentally shows flashes of the sharper movie it could’ve been.
We talk tone, pacing, and the delicate math of horror-comedy: why absurdity only lands when the world has rules, how character choices give jokes friction, and what happens when you skip setup and chase set pieces. Aykroyd’s judge hints at a better blueprint—a lonely showman versus a gleeful sadist—and we explore how a few structural changes could have turned Vulcanvania into a memorable cult playground rather than a cautionary tale. Along the way, we connect threads to House of Blues, appreciate the handful of precision laughs Chevy sneaks in, and call out John Candy’s split roles and the film’s most head-scratching creations.
Then we zoom out. Gen V returns with Hamish Linklater’s delicious menace, Midnight Mass gets its flowers for character-first dread, and we compare comedy fibers across The Office, Parks and Rec, The Paper, and the Frasier reboot—why some ensembles feel warm and others punch down. It all loops back to the craft: world-building is an engine; jokes and scares are cargo. If the engine sputters, nothing arrives.
Stick around for a celebratory tease: next week we’re queuing up Broken Arrow for Todd’s birthday. Hit follow, share this with your favorite cult-cinema friend, and drop us a note—what one change would fix Nothing but Trouble? Subscribe and leave a review to help more curious listeners find the show.
Written Lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Blues Brothers 2000: When Blues Loses its Soul
Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:00:00 -0400 ◦ 84 minutes
What happens when you take a cult classic like “The Blues Brothers,” remove its electric star, add a random child, strip away all profanity, and film it entirely on sterile soundstages? You get “Blues Brothers 2000,” one of the most bewildering sequel disasters in cinema history.
Our deep dive into this 1998 misfire reveals how profoundly the filmmakers misunderstood what made the original special. The first film thrived on John Belushi’s chaotic energy playing against Dan Aykroyd’s deadpan delivery, creating an unforgettable duo wreaking havoc through gritty Chicago streets. The sequel, however, leaves Aykroyd adrift without a worthy counterpart, with John Goodman’s talents wasted on an undeveloped character.
We explore the bizarre studio mandates that doomed this production from the start – including the requirement for a PG rating and the inexplicable demand to add a child character who disappears from the narrative for stretches at a time. The musical performances, while featuring legendary talents like Aretha Franklin and Erykah Badu, feel disconnected from the story, lacking the organic integration that made the original’s numbers so memorable.
The film’s most unintentionally hilarious moments deserve special attention: a car that drives underwater while characters casually converse, a face covered in shaving cream somehow functioning as a disguise, and a bizarre voodoo sequence where the characters become zombies for no discernible reason. These elements combine to create what we dubbed “the most sanitized movie ever made” – a sequel that strips away everything edgy and authentic about its predecessor.
Whether you’re a Blues Brothers devotee still nursing wounds from this sequel or someone who’s never experienced either film, our breakdown will have you laughing at the absurdity while appreciating why the original remains a beloved classic. Subscribe now for more deep dives into films that miss the mark in spectacular fashion!
Written lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025): Hook, Line, and Stinker
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:00:00 -0700 ◦ 85 minutes
Thirty years in the making, the legacy sequel to “I Know What You Did Last Summer” promised to resurrect a beloved 90s horror franchise by bringing back Julie James and Ray Bronson. What we got instead was a bewildering reinvention that left us questioning everything we loved about the original.
In this deep-dive episode, we unpack how this sequel fundamentally misunderstands what made the 1997 film work. The original gave us morally complex characters who committed a genuine crime and suffered authentic trauma. This new iteration offers a flimsy premise where fleeing an accident scene (that wasn’t even their fault) somehow warrants a murderous rampage. Without that solid foundation, the entire house of cards collapses.
The most egregious misstep comes with the killer reveal that completely rewrites a beloved character’s personality and motivation. When a film betrays its own legacy this profoundly, it’s not just disappointing – it’s almost fascinating in its misguided execution. We examine how this character assassination undermines not just this film but retroactively damages the original.
Beyond the plot problems, we discuss the film’s technical shortcomings: unmemorable kill scenes, underdeveloped characters, and wasted potential. The original film gave us iconic moments like Helen’s mannequin escape and Julie’s unforgettable bathroom scene. This sequel offers nothing that will linger in your nightmares – except perhaps the baffling script choices.
Is there anything to salvage? Surprisingly, yes. The soundtrack delivers some genuine bangers, Sarah Michelle Gellar’s brief cameo gives a fleeting glimpse of what could have been, and the final scene between survivors actually shows promise – making everything that came before even more frustrating.
Join us for this therapy session as we process our disappointment, celebrate what works, and try to understand how a franchise with such potential could go so terribly wrong. Whether you’re a die-hard fan of the original or curious about this new chapter, you’ll want to hear our unfiltered take on this fishy sequel.
Written Lovingly by AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Babylon A.D.: Snowmobiles, Submarines, and Supernatural Babies
Wed, 03 Sep 2025 18:00:00 -0700 ◦ 94 minutes
Welcome back to another episode of Hate Watching with Dan and Tony! This week, we’re diving into the 2008 sci-fi flick “Babylon A.D.” starring Vin Diesel. A movie so confusing, it made us question if it was even finished!
Join us as we try to make sense of a plot that is “very influenced by Children of Men” but fails to live up to it, a hero who collects $20 cashews, and a finale that leaves you with more questions than answers. We’ll discuss everything from a “virgin birth” to mind-reading “pill babies”, and the absurdity of a car chase with no stakes.
This episode is a masterclass in breaking down a movie’s baffling decisions and a celebration of what makes a good film truly great.
Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell for more movie chaos!
Join the Conversation:
- What’s the most confusing movie you’ve ever watched?
- Have you seen Babylon A.D.? What did you think?
- Leave your best movie recommendations for us in the comments!
Written lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
Hate Watching Alien vs. Predator (AVP): The Almost-Kiss That Shocked the World!
Wed, 27 Aug 2025 12:00:00 -0700 ◦ 83 minutes
Welcome, fellow cinephiles and movie-haters! In this episode of Hate Watching with Dan and Tony, we’re taking on a true heavyweight of bad cinema: the 2004 movie
“Alien vs. Predator”!
Dan and Tony put this sci-fi showdown under the microscope, tackling some of the most ridiculous movie moments you’ve ever seen. We’re talking about an entire mission launched because of a “heat globe,” an alien’s blood being an “endless acid,” and a group of “schmucks” who make all the wrong decisions. You’ll laugh, you’ll cringe, and you might even wonder if a chemical engineer’s degree can help you survive an alien attack.
Is AVP truly one of the worst movies ever made? Tune in and decide for yourself!
Connect with the community!
- What’s your favorite bad movie?
- Did you hate-watch AVP?
- Leave a comment below with your thoughts and movie suggestions!
- Subscribe and hit the notification bell for more episodes!
Written lovingly with AI
Be our friend!
Dan: @shakybacon
Tony: @tonydczech
And follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT
